Texas trial courts have broad discretion in conservatorship decisions, particularly when the record reflects that the ongoing conflict between parents isn’t in the best interests of the involved children. In a recent case, the Third Court of Appeals reaffirmed that discretion by upholding a conservatorship ruling despite one parent’s objections to the conduct of the proceedings.

The case involved a contested conservatorship proceeding between a separating husband and wife, co-parents of two young children. Throughout their legal battle, the trial court issued multiple temporary orders addressing conservatorship and possession of the children.

Initially, both parents were named temporary joint managing conservators, but the husband was granted the exclusive right to designate the children’s primary residence. As the parents continued to have challenges, later court orders imposed restrictions on the wife’s possession and visitation rights.

Sometimes, a spouse may fail to take appropriate action when their spouse has filed for divorce.  If the spouse fails to participate in the proceedings, the petitioning spouse may seek a default divorce decree.  Texas law disfavors default judgments, and in some cases, a default judgment may be set aside.  The Texas Supreme Court of Texas recently considered a case in which the wife sought to set aside a default divorce decree.

The parties had been married for 13 years when the wife moved in with her parents due to alleged mistreatment by the husband.  The husband petitioned for divorce and informed the wife that he had done so.  The wife testified she did not have money for an attorney and did not know what to do.  She said she thought she would be served in person.  Her father said they waited for service of process.

According to the appeals court, there were multiple unsuccessful attempts of service over several months, and the trial court ultimately authorized alternative service.  The papers were posted on the front door at the wife’s parents’ home, but she did not file a timely answer.

Continue Reading ›

Generally, if a spouse dies while a Texas divorce case is pending but before the divorce is finalized, the case is dismissed and the marriage is considered to have ended upon death of the spouse.  This can have a significant impact on the rights of the surviving spouse regarding children and property.  If, however, the court rendered a full and final adjudication before the spouse’s death, then the divorce will be considered final.  Thus, when a spouse dies during a divorce case, whether judgment has been rendered can be an issue with significant consequences.  In a recent case, a wife challenged a divorce decree rendered after the death of the husband and intervention of his adult daughter.

The husband petitioned for divorce in October 2021.  The husband and wife signed a rule 11 agreement, which the appeals court described as “handwritten entries on a printed form.” An exhibit purporting to distributes the assets and liabilities was attached.  The husband, the wife, their respective attorneys, and the judge signed the document.  The husband’s attorney and the wife’s attorney both withdrew.

The husband passed away in October 2023.  The following month, the wife’s new attorney filed a motion to dismiss for want of prosecution, alleging the parties had reconciled after the rule 11 agreement.  The trial court dismissed the case.

Continue Reading ›

The community estate must be divided in a “just and right” manner in a Texas divorce, but that does not always mean an equal division. In a recent case, a former husband challenged a property division that awarded the wife about 70% of the community estate, along with a money judgment of $365,000.

The parties got married in 1998 and stopped living together in 2021.  The husband petitioned for divorce in 2022, alleging insupportability and requesting a disproportionate share of the community estate.  The wife also alleged insupportability and adultery by the husband.  She also alleged the husband committed fraud on the community estate and requested a disproportionate share of the estate.

The trial court awarded the wife about 70% and the husband about 30% of the community estate.

Continue Reading ›

Characterization of property can be a significant issue in a Texas divorce.  The Texas Family Code includes a presumption that property owned by a spouse at the time of divorce is community property, but this presumption can be overcome by clear and convincing evidence the property is the spouse’s separate property.  Separate property includes property owned by a spouse before the marriage and property inherited during the marriage.  In a recent case, a former husband challenged the trial court’s award of certain property to the wife after declaring it had become community property.

The husband owned certain real property before the parties married in July 2020. The wife filed for divorce in December 2021.  The wife conceded that property had been the husband’s separate property.  In March, 2021, the husband signed a general warranty deed.  That deed listed husband, “a single man,” as the grantor and husband, “a married man,” as the grantee, with consideration of 10.00 “and other good and valuable consideration.”

The wife asked the court to grant a partial summary judgment determining the property was converted to community property.  She submitted a copy of the deed and an affidavit from her attorney as summary judgment evidence.

Continue Reading ›

A court can modify a Texas custody or visitation order if the modification would be in the child’s best interest and there has been a material and substantial change in circumstances since the prior order was rendered.  Tex. Fam. Code § 156.101(a)(1)(A).  Whether a material and substantial change in circumstances has occurred is a fact-specific question.

In a recent case, a father challenged the modification of his child’s custody.

The parties divorced when their child was seven years old.  According to the appeals court, the divorce decree named both parents joint managing conservators with a “Week-On/ Week-Off” schedule.  It imposed a geographic restriction limiting the child’s primary residence within a particular school district.

Continue Reading ›

Spouses sometimes convey property to each other during the marriage for various reasons.  In some cases, those conveyances may become an issue if the couple divorces. In a recent case, a former husband challenged the property division awarding the former wife two pieces of property, even though he had executed deeds conveying those properties to her.

The wife petitioned for divorce in June 2021 after more than 14 years of marriage.  She identified a home and a separate plot of land as her separate property.  She presented copies of a Special Gift Warranty deed by which the husband’s parents gifted the home to him, a later General Warranty deed by which the husband conveyed the home to the wife, a General Warranty Deed conveying the land to the husband, and a subsequent General Warranty deed conveying the land from the husband to the wife.  She identified both properties as her separate property in her Initial Disclosures. The husband did not identify those properties as property he currently owned, separate property, or property against which he had a claim in his discovery responses.

The wife moved for partial summary judgment, asking the court to hold that both properties were her separate properties. She alleged the husband received the home as a gift from his parents, and then conveyed it to her as her separate property. She alleged he bought the land during the marriage and signed a General Warranty Deed conveying it to her in 2020.  She argued he conveyed his undivided one-half community interest in the land to her, raising the gift presumption.

Continue Reading ›

Parties in a Texas high net worth divorce with complex assets may desire to reach an agreement regarding the property division.  While an agreement is often intended to avoid further litigation, in some cases three may be ongoing disputes.  A former wife recently challenged several declarations made by the trial court regarding her former husband’s obligations to pay her amounts received from his business interests.

During the parties’ marriage, the husband acquired significant real estate interests during the marriage, primarily through a group of companies identified by the court as the “KN Companies” and another company.  The parties separated in 2009 and executed an informal settlement agreement in 2012 that stated it was “BINDING AND IRREVOCABLE.”  This Binding Settlement Agreement (“BSA”) stated that the value of the “Total Community Estate” was $12,154,024 and that 55.75% would go to the husband and 44.25% to the wife.

The agreed final divorce decree was signed in December 2016.  The decree stated the parties had separately entered into an Agreement Incident to Divorce (“Agreement”) and incorporated the Agreement into the decree.  The court also found the Agreement and ancillary documents (“Final Settlement Documents”) were stipulated to represent an integrated merger of the BSA and, if there were any conflicts, the Final Settlement Documents would control.

Continue Reading ›

While ideally, parties to a Texas divorce can resolve matters amicably, some high net worth divorces can lead to years of ongoing litigation. In a recent case, a former husband appealed an order requiring him to pay the former wife $100,000.  This appeal was the third appeal arising from the parties’ 2019 divorce.

Both parties had challenged the property division in the original divorce decree. In the first appeal, the appeals court concluded the trial court had mischaracterized certain property, with a difference of more than $1 million to the ex-wife.  The appeals court therefore concluded that a mischaracterization of that amount affected the just and right division of the community estate and remanded for a new property division.

The ex-husband appealed the second decree, arguing that there should have been a new trial on remand because several of the properties had changed form since the original decree or no longer existed. He argued the trial court erred when it refused to consider evidence of changes in the property after the divorce.  The appeals court rejected this argument, noting that the community assets are generally valued as of the date of the divorce.  The trial court could have reasonably determined that the changes could later be addressed in an enforcement proceeding. The appeals court affirmed the 2023 decree.

Continue Reading ›

A court may grant a Texas divorce based on cruel treatment of one spouse toward the other if it “renders further living together insupportable.” “Cruelty” has been defined in Texas case law as an act endangering or threatening “life, limb or health. . .including. . .any infliction of mental pain or anguish.” Daughtry v. Daughtry.  A father recently challenged the decree granting a divorce on the ground of cruelty.

According to the appeals court, the parties married in Cameroon and moved to the U.S. The mother and older child moved to Washington, D.C. while the mother was pregnant with the younger child.

The father petitioned for divorce in December 2022.  The mother argued D.C. should have jurisdiction as the children’s home state. The district court found Texas was the older child’s home state, but left the question of jurisdiction over the younger child to a D.C. court. The D.C. Court determined it had jurisdiction and awarded sole custody of the younger child to the mother.

Continue Reading ›

Contact Information