When individuals with a high net worth marry, they often bring significant separate assets to the marriage.  When marriages with complex estates end, there may be disputes over whether property is community property or the separate property of one of the spouses. The trial court in a divorce must divide the community estate of the parties in a just and right manner.  The trial court generally may not divest a spouse of their separate property by awarding it in whole or in part to the other spouse.   Community property is the property, other than separate property, acquired by either spouse during the marriage.  Tex. Fam. Code § 3.002. Separate property includes property the spouse owned before the marriage and property gifted, devised, or descended to the spouse during the marriage.  Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001.  Texas law has a rebuttable presumption that property possessed by either spouse at the time of the divorce is community property.  Tex. Fam. Code § 3.003.  The spouse claiming property is separate has the burden of proving the property’s character by clear and convincing evidence.  In a recent case, a husband appealed a property division he claimed improperly divested him of his separate property.

The Property

The parties got married in 2008.  The wife petitioned for divorce in 2021 and subsequently amended her complaint to allege adultery.  The primary issue at trial was the characterization of a particular piece of real property.

According to the appeals court’s opinion, the husband’s parents gave him a tract of land in 1995. The wife testified it was her understanding the husband’s parents had given the property to him as a gift in 1995. The husband testified that he had a house moved onto the land the same year.

Continue Reading ›

During a Texas divorce case, the court may appoint a receiver to preserve and protect the parties’ property. Tex. Fam. Code § 6.502(a)(5).  The receiver’s role is to receive and preserve property for all of the parties, not just the party who applied for a receiver.  Protecting assets can be particularly important in a complex estate involving business interests, real property and other assets under the control of one spouse. A husband recently appealed appointment of a receiver in his divorce case.

According to the appeals court’s opinion, the parties had been married for about 12 years when the wife petitioned for divorce.  The wife requested appointment of a receiver, alleging the husband had transferred community assets.  The husband argued that some of the assets were his separate property and that a receiver should not be appointment when there was another available remedy.  He argued the wife had filed a lis pendens on the real property.

The Hearing

At the hearing, the wife’s attorney argued the husband was a successful doctor who had transferred assets worth millions to Lebanon and Syria.  She argued he had cancelled the credit card and closed the joint bank account.  She stated they did not know where the money went because the husband did not answer discovery.  The attorney argued the hearing was urgent because it would be hard to enforce the orders once the funds were in Syria or Lebanon, noting there had been previous injunctions against transfers of money and sales of property.

Continue Reading ›

Parties to a high net worth Texas divorce may choose to arbitrate disputes because arbitration can be less expensive, less contentious, and more private than litigation.  An arbitration award can be difficult to challenge, however. Under the Texas Arbitration Act, a trial court may only vacate an arbitration award based on one of the grounds listed, including the arbitrator exceeding his authority.  Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 171.088. The arbitrator’s power is based on the arbitration agreement between the parties. In Texas, arbitration awards are presumed to be valid. When a party seeks to vacate an arbitration award, they have the burden of establishing the grounds based on the complete record.  An appeals court presumes there was sufficient evidence to support the arbitration award if there is not a transcript of the arbitration hearing.  A Texas appeals court recently considered a wife’s challenge to an arbitration award addressing the division of certain disputed personal property after the parties reached a mediated settlement agreement as to the property division.

The parties entered into a mediated settlement agreement (“MSA”) and memorialized it in an agreement incident to divorce (“AID”). Pursuant to the AID, the wife would receive $17 million in cash, in addition to multiple pieces of real property, vehicles, and multiple accounts.  The parties were to agree in writing to the division of personal property from two of their homes and submit any items they could not agree on to arbitration.  The court incorporated the AID into the final divorce decree.

Arbitration Proceedings

They later signed a binding arbitration agreement to address the disputed personal property from the two homes. Pursuant to the arbitration agreement, each party would be allowed to present a position statement orally in writing.  The wife submitted a list of disputed personal property she sought to be awarded to her, including some items that were to go to her pursuant to the AID.

Continue Reading ›

A pre-marital agreement can be a valuable way to protect assets in a high net worth Texas divorce.  A pre-marital agreement can help protect a spouse’s interest in a business, identify property that will remain separate, or describe how a complex estate will be divided in the event of a divorce.  In some cases, however, a party may challenge the validity of the pre-marital agreement.  The Texas Family Code sets forth the circumstances under which a pre-marital agreement will not be enforced, but matters may become more complicated if the agreement was signed in another state.  A wife recently challenged an order applying Louisiana law to the validity and enforceability of a pre-marital agreement.

The Pre-marital Agreement

The parties got married in Louisiana in 1990.  They purportedly signed a pre-marital agreement pursuant to Louisiana law a few days before the marriage.  The agreement provided that only the husband’s salary from a particular company would be community property. All other income generated by his efforts would remain his separate property.  All revenue generated by the wife’s efforts would be her separate property.

Applicable Law

The wife petitioned for divorce in Texas in 2019.  The husband asked the trial court to enforce the agreement. The wife asserted a number of defenses to enforcement of the agreement under Texas law.

Continue Reading ›

Parties in a high profile divorce might want to enter an agreement that goes beyond dividing the property. Celebrities, business owners, or CEOs might seek an agreement that prohibits their former spouse from disclosing private information, disparaging them or their business, or engaging in other behaviors that might damage their reputation or their business.  The agreement can include liquidated damages for violations.  In a recent case, a former wife, her former husband, and his business all appealed a judgment confirming an arbitration award relating to an agreement incident to divorce.

The Agreement

At the time of the divorce, the parties entered into an agreement incident to divorce providing for arbitration if a party engaged in certain conduct prohibited by the agreement.  The agreement provided for an award of the greater of $500,000 or actual damages.  Additionally, the wife would forfeit interest in a trust as liquidated damages if she engaged in certain behaviors.  The parties agreed to arbitrate any issue of whether a party committed a prohibited behavior, whether the wife violated specified provisions in the agreement, and whether the wife’s interest in the trust would be forfeited as a result of violating provisions of the agreement.  Binding arbitration was to occur within 90 days of notice of a violation.  Pursuant to the Agreement, the losing party would pay the arbitration costs and the other parties’ costs and fees.  The husband’s company was a third party to the divorce and to the agreement. The decree incorporated the agreement.

Arbitration Demand

The husband and his company subsequently demanded arbitration, alleging the wife violated the agreement.  The wife objected and argued the forfeiture and liquidated provisions were unenforceable and that the arbitration clause was therefore also unenforceable.

Continue Reading ›

In a high net worth divorce, the parties may want to reach an amicable resolution of property division.  In a recent Texas divorce case, a husband challenged the final divorce decree that upheld the parties settlement agreement without giving him notice and a hearing.

The parties got married in March 2021 and stopped living together in January 2023.  The entered into a Mediated Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) shortly thereafter.

Proceedings

The wife petitioned for divorce in 2023, asking the court to divide the estate according to the terms of the MSA.  The MSA was signed by both parties and notarized.  Additionally, both parties had initialed each page.  The MSA addressed the division of the community property and liabilities, including personal property, real property, business interests, and debt.

Continue Reading ›

The court in a Texas divorce case must divide the parties’ estate in a just and right manner. Tex. Fam. Code § 7.001. Complex estates may include both community and separate property, acquired from various sources.  The court can only divide community property, which is any property acquired by a spouse during the marriage except separate property.  Separate property includes property owned by the spouse before the marriage and property acquired by a spouse during the marriage through gift, devise, or descent.  Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001(2).  There is a presumption property either spouse possesses during or on dissolution of the marriage is community property and a spouse claiming property is separate has the burden of proof to a clear and convincing standard. Tex. Fam. Code § 3.003.

In a recent case, a former wife appealed the court’s property division in the final divorce decree. The parties got married in 1999 and had one child. The husband petitioned for divorce in 2017. He asked the court to confirm two pieces of real property were his separate property.  The wife sought reimbursement to and reconstitution of the community estate and spousal maintenance.  The court filed the final divorce decree in January 2024 and the wife appealed.

Separate Property

On appeal, the wife challenged the trial court’s characterization of the “69th Street property” as the husband’s separate property.  She argued the husband had not presented sufficient evidence to support his testimony that he had inherited it.

Continue Reading ›

When a parent petitions for modification of a Texas custody order, the parties may raise multiple issues.  In a recent case, a mother challenged a modification order, arguing the trial court had erred in not submitting one of her proposed questions to the jury.

Original Modification Proceedings

The parties had two children together.  The trial court initially appointed them both joint managing conservators with neither having the exclusive right to designate the children’s primary residence, pursuant to the parties’ Mediated Settlement Agreement.

The father subsequently petitioned for modification, alleging both parents being joint managing conservators was not in the children’s best interest.  He sought sole managing conservatorship, or, alternatively, the exclusive right to designate the children’s primary residence.

Continue Reading ›

“Domestic support obligations” as defined by the U.S. Bankruptcy Code are generally exempt from discharge in bankruptcy.  Therefore, child support or spousal maintenance generally cannot be discharged in bankruptcy and must be paid.  The treatment of other types of awards that may be granted in a Texas divorce, however, may not be so clear.  In a recent case, a former wife appealed a divorce decree that expressly stated that an award of attorney’s fees against her was a domestic support obligation pursuant to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

The parties got married in September 2021 and the wife filed for divorce that December.  The husband subsequently filed a counterpetition, alleging adultery by the wife.  He asked the court to order the wife to pay his attorney’s fees and costs and classify them as a domestic support obligation for purposes of bankruptcy.

The court granted the divorce based on adultery and awarded attorney’s fees to the husband.  The court granted an award of $38,306 to the husband’s attorney and the firm.  The divorce decree stated that the attorney’s fees would be “considered a domestic support obligation. . .”

Continue Reading ›

Texas custody cases involving multiple children can be complex, because the children may not have the same needs.  In a recent case, a father challenged a modification that gave the mother rights with regard to the youngest child that he was awarded for the older two children.

The parents got married in 2006 and divorced in 2017.  They had three children.  In the agreed divorce decree, both parents were named joint managing conservators with shared possession of the children.  In November 2020, the father petitioned for modification, alleging a material and substantial change in circumstances related to one child’s emotional health and welfare. He subsequently amended the petition to alleged the same regarding another of the children, and ultimately filed an amended petition seeking relief for all three of the children.

The court held a bench trial and signed a partially handwritten memorandum, with a note that the mother’s attorney would draft the final order.  Although the memorandum was entered in early November 2022, the parties did not receive it until April 2023.

Continue Reading ›

Contact Information