Texas Divorce Attorney Blog

Texas Supreme Court Says Courts Must Consider Child’s Expenses Along with Child Support in Spousal Support Analysis

Published on: June 30, 2025 | by Francesca Blackard

The Texas Family Code sets out the circumstances under which Texas spousal maintenance may be ordered. The court may order maintenance to a spouse only if they will lack sufficient property after the divorce to provide for their minimum reasonable needs. The spouse must also meet one of three conditions, either: (A) being unable to earn sufficient income to meet their minimum reasonable needs because of an incapacitating disability; (B) having been married for at least 10 years and lacking the ability to earn sufficient income; or (C) being the custodian of a child of the marriage who has a disability and requires substantial care and supervision that prevents the spouse from earning sufficient income. Tex. Fam. Code § 8.051. It is generally within the court’s discretion to determine a spouse’s “minimum reasonable needs.”

The Texas Supreme Court recently considered the nature of evidence required to support a spousal maintenance award.

The wife stopped working outside the home to become their primary caregiver to the parties’ triplets. One of them was a “medically fragile child” who needed extensive medical treatment.

Texas Home Confirmed Wife’s Separate Property Despite Deed Granting Interest to Husband

Published on: June 30, 2025 | by Francesca Blackard

Property characterization can be a significant area of contention in Texas divorces, particularly in high net worth divorces or those in which one party entered the marriage with significantly more assets. Texas law presumes that property possessed by either spouse during or on dissolution is community property. That presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence the property is separate. Tex. Fam. Code § 3.003. Property conveyed by one spouse to the other is generally presumed to be a gift. Clear and convincing evidence the conveying spouse did not intend to gift the property is needed to rebut the gift presumption. A former husband recently challenged characterization of the marital residence as the wife’s separate property despite execution of a general warranty deed granting him an undivided one-half interest.

The parties got married in 2001 and the wife petitioned for divorce in 2021. The trial court found the marital home was the wife’s separate property. According to the appeals court’s opinion, she bought it two years before the marriage and refinanced it in 2003. She also signed a general warranty deed that granted the husband an undivided half interest. The court found the wife did not intend to gift the property to the husband and provided an alternate reason for executing the warranty deed. The court also found refinancing had not changed the property’s character. The trial court awarded the wife conditional appellate attorney’s fees if the husband appealed to the Court of Appeals or the Supreme Court of Texas and the wife “substantially prevail[ed].]”

The husband appealed the home’s characterization and the conditional appellate attorney’s fees award.

Texas Appeals Court Affirms Order for Partition and Sale of Property after Divorce

Published on: June 30, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

Ideally, after a Texas divorce, the parties will cooperate and take any actions needed to sell or transfer property and resolve outstanding issues, but that does not always happen. A Texas appeals court recently considered a case in which a former wife alleged the former husband was preventing the sale of jointly-owned property.

Divorce Case

The parties divorced in March 2020. According to the appeals court’s opinion, the final divorce decree found that a particular piece of real property was community property and awarded each party 50% as their separate property, leaving them tenants in common. The decree did not address sale or partition of the property.

Second Lawsuit

A couple of months after the decree was signed, the former wife filed suit against the former husband, seeking an order for the sale of the property and partition of the proceeds. She also requested attorney’s fees, expenses, and interest. This lawsuit was ultimately consolidated into the divorce case. The court held a bench trial and signed an order finding the parties were co-tenants and that the property was not subject to partition in kind. The order required the property be listed by June 1, 2022 and that the parties to take all necessary steps and execute any necessary documents to facilitate the sale. The court also ordered that any proceeds after payment of any encumbrances on the property be split equally between the parties. It did not address the wife’s request for fees, expenses, and interest.

Texas Appeals Court Upholds Father’s Custody in International Custody Dispute

Published on: June 30, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

International marriages can lead to complex divorces, especially in regards to child custody. In a recent Texas divorce case, a mother appealed a decree that awarded the father the exclusive right to designate the child’s primary residence.

According to the appeals court, the parties married while the father was stationed in Germany with the U.S. Army. The child was born in Germany after the father was sent to San Antonio. A few months later, the mother and baby joined him in Texas.

The mother and child visited Germany. The father told the mother the marriage was over, and she decided to stay there. She did not bring the child back when he asked her to do so. He sued her for child abduction and went to Germany for Hague Convention proceedings. They ultimately reached an agreement and the mother and child returned to Texas.

Texas Appeals Court Affirms Disproportionate Property Division Despite Wife’s Adultery

Published on: June 30, 2025 | by Francesca Blackard

A Texas property division must be “just and right,” but that does not necessarily mean equal. A court may consider a party’s fault in the division when determining how to divide the property, but it may not use the property division to punish the at-fault spouse. A former husband recently challenged his divorce decree, arguing in part that the court abused its discretion by not considering the wife’s adultery in its property division.

According to the appeals court, both parties were from India, but the husband was working in Texas prior to the marriage. The parties got married in India in 2004 and wife moved to Texas with the husband. They had two children together.

The husband petitioned for divorce on the grounds of adultery in October 2018. He asked the court to award him the marital residence. In her counterpetition, the wife alleged the husband had committed acts of cruelty. Both parties alleged fraud on the community by the other spouse.

Court Determines Wife’s Spousal Maintenance Should Be Considered

Published on: May 21, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

Tex. Fam. Code § 6.001 allows a court to “grant divorce without regard to fault” if it finds the marriage has become insupportable without “any reasonable expectation of reconciliation. A court may also grant a divorce in favor of one spouse if it finds cruel treatment or adultery by the other spouse. Tex. Fam. Code §§ 6.002 – 6.003. In a recent case, a former wife appealed the divorce decree granting divorce based on insupportability when she argued she had presented sufficient evidence of her husband’s cruel treatment of her. She also challenged the court’s denial of her request for spousal maintenance.

According to the appeals court’s opinion, the parties got married in March 2019 and separated about a year later. The wife accused the husband of choking her and he was arrested. An emergency order of protection prohibited him from going within 200 yards of the parties’ home. A district court ultimately entered a final protective order and found the husband had “committed family violence.” Due to that order, the wife had exclusive use of the home and the husband was ordered to pay the expenses for the home in addition to paying the wife monthly support.

The wife petitioned for divorce. She asserted insupportability and cruelty as alternative grounds for the divorce.

Husband’s Reimbursement Claim For High Dollar Assets Taken After Separation by Wife Denied

Published on: May 14, 2025 | by Francesca Blackard

Reimbursement is an equitable right arises in a Texas divorce when the property of one marital estate is used to the benefit of another marital estate, resulting in unjust enrichment to the benefited estate if not repaid. Tex. Fam. Code § 3.402. A spouse may pursue a reimbursement claim, for example, if community property funds are used to pay the debt for or make improvements to the other spouse’s separate property. The court must apply equitable principles to determine if it will recognize a claim for reimbursement, considering the relative circumstances of both parties and, if the court determines the reimbursement claim is appropriate, it must order a just and right division of the claim for reimbursement, with regard for the rights of the parties and children. Tex. Fam. Code § 7.007. The spouse seeking reimbursement has the burden of proving that the property of one marital estate was used by one or both spouses to benefit another marital estate, the value of that benefit, and that the benefited estate will be unjustly enriched if reimbursement is not required. Tex. Fam. Code § 3.402(b). The trial court has broad discretion in determining reimbursement claims.

In a recent case, a former husband appealed the divorce decree that did not award him reimbursement. The wife petitioned for divorce in 2022, after nearly 50 years of marriage. In his counterpetition, the husband made a claim for reimbursement, but the court did not award him reimbursement in the final divorce decree.

The Husband’s Appeal

The husband appealed, arguing the trial court did not properly apply the law regarding reimbursement of the community estate. The judge stated, “whatever she took with her [in 2016] the marriage was still ongoing . . . . I cannot go back in time and fix that.” The husband argued the court misstated the law.

Texas Appeals Court Upholds Award of Husband’s Retirement Despite Premarital Agreement Terms

Published on: May 8, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

Spouses can agree to change their rights and obligations with regard to property by signing a Texas pre-marital agreement. Premarital agreements, also known as prenuptial agreements, are often used in circumstances involving a high net worth or where one spouse enters the marriage with significantly more assets than the other. While prenuptial agreements can be valuable tools to protect a spouse’s assets, they can also be contentious in the event of a divorce.

A husband recently challenged the property division in his divorce decree, arguing the trial court had not followed the premarital agreement in dividing the parties’ property.

Before the marriage, the parties executed a premarital agreement the husband bought online.

Texas Not “Home State” of Child Whose Mother Moved to Illinois During Pregnancy

Published on: May 5, 2025 | by Francesca Blackard

Texas has adopted the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (“UCCJEA”), which identifies what state has jurisdiction over custody matters. The UCCJEA generally prioritizes the child’s home state for jurisdiction. The child’s home state is where they have lived with a parent for the six months before the custody proceeding commenced, or if they are less than six months old, where they have lived with a parent since birth.

For a Texas court to have jurisdiction to make an initial child custody determination, Texas must be the child’s home state on the date the proceeding commenced or must have been the child’s home state within six months before the proceeding commenced if the child is absent from Texas but a parent or person acting as a parent still lives in Texas. Tex. Fam. Code § 152.201(a)(1). Texas may also have jurisdiction if another state court does not have jurisdiction or if child’s home state court declined jurisdiction because Texas was a more appropriate forum and the child and the parents, or the child and at least one parent or on person acting as a parent, have a significant connection with Texas and there is substantial evidence in Texas regarding the child. Tex. Fam. Code § 152.201(a)(2). A Texas court may also have jurisdiction if all courts having jurisdiction on the grounds above have declined to exercise it because a Texas court is a more appropriate forum. Tex. Fam. Code § 152.201(a)(3). Furthermore, Texas may have jurisdiction when no other court or any state would have jurisdiction based on the above criteria. Tex. Fam. Code § 152.201(a)(4).

A mother recently challenged a Texas court’s jurisdiction over her child’s custody. According to the appeals court’s opinion, the parties separated while the mother was pregnant and she moved to Chicago before the child was born. The mother filed for divorce in Illinois and the father filed for divorce in Texas. The mother’s petition did not include an issue related to the custody of the unborn child, but the father’s petition did. The child was born in in Illinois after both petitions had been filed.

Texas Supreme Court Vacates Divorce Filed by Guardian in High Net Worth Divorce

Published on: April 27, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

A Texas marriage may end by either death of a spouse or a court order. Generally, it is clear how a marriage ended, but in some cases, there can be a dispute. In a recent case, the Texas Supreme Court considered whether a divorce filed by the husband’s guardian resulted in a valid divorce decree before the husband’s death.

The husband had significant assets. He and his fourth wife signed a pre-marital agreement before the marriage in September 2011 and a post-marital agreement, agreeing no community property would be created and each spouse would keep their separate property unless they transferred it to the other in writing or by a will.

The husband petitioned for divorce after about seven months, but was diagnosed with dementia. He failed to prosecute the case and it was dismissed. His daughter claimed he still wanted the divorce, while the wife alleged he changed his mind.