Kelly McClure, Author at Texas Divorce Attorney Blog

Texas Supreme Court Rejects Foreign Divorce Judgment Over Due Process Violations

Published on: November 5, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

Texas courts may recognize divorce judgments issued in other countries under the doctrine of international comity, but that recognition is not automatic. In a recent decision, the Texas Supreme Court held that a foreign divorce obtained without constitutionally adequate notice could not prevent a spouse from pursuing divorce proceedings in Texas. Azhar v. Choudhri, No. 24-0939 (Tex. Sept. 25, 2026).

Foreign Divorce and Community Property Dispute

The parties married in Pakistan in 2008, and the wife moved to Houston in 2010. During their marriage, the couple accumulated more than $100 million in community assets through the husband’s Texas business interests.

Understanding Parental Rights Termination in Texas: Why Endangerment Findings Are Hard to Overturn on Appeal

Published on: October 19, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

Terminating parental rights in Texas requires clear and convincing evidence of both a statutory ground for termination and that termination serves the child’s best interest. A recent Texas appeals court decision demonstrates how evidence of past endangerment can undermine a parent’s efforts to overturn a termination order, even when the parent claims to have made improvements. Tex. Fam. Code § 161.001(b).

Texas Court Terminates Mother’s Parental Rights Following Drug Use Allegations

In In re J.B. and B.B., the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services filed a termination lawsuit in June 2024 following reports of substance abuse, neglectful supervision, and unsafe living conditions. Both children tested positive for illegal drugs, and the Department had investigated the family repeatedly since 2015. No. 11-26-00093-CV (Tex. App.—Eastland Sep. 24, 2026, no pet.) (mem. op.).

Abby Elliott and Bill Kennedy’s Divorce Raises Questions About Spousal Maintenance Under Texas Law

Published on: October 5, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

The Bear actor Abby Elliott and her producer husband, Bill Kennedy, are divorcing after nearly ten years of marriage. Both spouses are asking for spousal support while simultaneously asking the court to prevent the other from receiving it. Elliott requested support when she filed for divorce, and Kennedy later filed his own request for support while seeking to terminate the court’s ability to award support to Elliott. Although their divorce is governed by California law, we can analyze how their case hypothetically could play out under Texas law.

In Texas, a spouse’s request for maintenance does not establish that the spouse is entitled to receive it. Here, a court may award post-divorce maintenance only when the spouse seeking it satisfies the requirements detailed in the Texas Family Code. Tex. Fam. Code § 8.051.

When Can a Spouse Receive Spousal Maintenance in Texas?

Separate Property Reimbursement for Marital Home Mortgages Under Texas Family Code § 3.402

Published on: September 21, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

When one spouse uses separate property to pay down the mortgage on a home owned by the community estate, the spouse may be entitled to reimbursement in a Texas divorce. This can occur when a spouse uses money from an inheritance, savings accumulated before marriage, or other separate funds to pay a debt that benefits the community estate. Tex. Fam. Code § 3.402.

Separate Property and the Marital Home

Texas law generally classifies property owned by a spouse before marriage, as well as property acquired during marriage by gift or inheritance, as separate property. Property acquired during marriage is generally community property. Tex. Fam. Code §§ 3.001–.002.

Texas Supreme Court Clarifies When a Jury Verdict Controls a Child’s Primary Residence

Published on: September 8, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

When parents are going through a custody dispute, it can be difficult to understand what role the judge and jury play in the custody award. A question that arose in a recent Texas Supreme Court case was: if a jury decides that the children should primarily live with one parent, can a judge still give the other parent more time with the children? The court addressed the issue and clarified that a judge cannot use a possession schedule to effectively override the jury’s decision about which parent will have the children’s primary residence. Gopalan v. Marsh, No. 25-0161, slip op. at 12–13 (Tex. May 22, 2026).

The Facts of the Case

The case arose from the divorce of Prabhakar Gopalan and Andrea Marsh following their nine-year marriage. The parents agreed to joint managing conservatorship of their two children, but they disputed the allocation of parental rights, possession, and other issues concerning the children. After a five-day jury trial, the jury determined that Gopalan should have the exclusive right to designate the children’s primary residence within Travis County.

Texas Supreme Court Clarifies That CPS Cannot Require a Parent to Divorce to Keep Parental Rights

Published on: August 21, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

A recent opinion from the Texas Supreme Court addresses an important limitation on the State’s authority in parental termination cases involving domestic violence. Although Texas law requires parents to protect their children from abusive environments, the Court reaffirmed that the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) cannot require a parent to divorce an abusive spouse as a prerequisite to retaining parental rights. Rather, termination must rest on the statutory requirements established by the Texas Family Code and the evidence presented in the individual case. In re H.S., B.S., and M.S., Children, No. 24-0307 (Tex. June 5, 2026).

Background of the Case

DFPS became involved with a family following repeated incidents of domestic violence between the parents. The record reflected that the father physically assaulted the mother on multiple occasions, including sexually touching her, threatening her with a firearm, damaging property during violent outbursts, and engaging in self-harming behavior in the presence of the children.

Recent Case Demonstrates Why Precise Premarital Agreement Language Matters for Business Owners in Texas

Published on: August 10, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

Texas law allows prospective spouses to alter many of the default rules governing marital property through a premarital agreement. When a valid agreement clearly defines how property will be characterized, courts generally enforce those terms rather than rewrite the parties’ bargain to achieve what might otherwise be viewed as a “just and right” result. Tex. Fam. Code §§ 4.001-4.010; Tex. Fam. Code § 7.001.

A recent decision from the Third Court of Appeals illustrates why this principle is particularly important for high-net-worth business owners whose wealth is tied to closely held companies, corporate distributions, and evolving business interests. Henry Hutcherson III v. Tina Hutcherson, No. 03-24-00297-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Mar. 19, 2026).

The Content of the Premarital Agreement

Why Financial Tracing Matters More Than Family Testimony in Texas Divorce

Published on: July 27, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

High-net-worth divorces often involve inherited wealth, family gifts, investment accounts, and closely held business interests that one spouse believes should remain separate property. Under Texas law, however, having witnesses assert that an asset is separate property is not enough.

A recent decision from the Texas Third Court of Appeals demonstrates how that burden is applied in practice. In O’Connor v. O’Connor, the court examined whether testimony from multiple family members could establish that mineral interests acquired during the marriage were purchased with the husband’s separate property.

Ultimately, the court concluded that the evidence did not satisfy Texas tracing requirements because the financial documentation left critical gaps. (O’Connor v. O’Connor, No. 03-23-00407-CV, 2025 WL ___ (Tex. App.—Austin July 30, 2025).

Texas Supreme Court Clarifies Evidence Required to Support Spousal Maintenance Award

Published on: July 13, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

A spouse seeking post-divorce maintenance in Texas must establish that they lack sufficient property to provide for minimum reasonable needs. While that requirement appears straightforward, disputes frequently arise regarding what evidence is necessary to satisfy the statutory standard. In Mehta v. Mehta, the Texas Supreme Court addressed that issue and clarified the type of evidence trial courts may consider when evaluating a request for spousal maintenance. Mehta v. Mehta, No. 23-0507 (Tex. June 20, 2025).

Background of the Case

Hannah and Manish Mehta were married for more than twenty years and had triplets during the marriage. The evidence presented at trial showed that Hannah largely stepped away from the workforce and became the children’s primary caregiver. One of the children suffered from significant medical conditions that required extensive supervision and daily care.

Texas Supreme Court Denies Review in Child Custody and Termination Appeal

Published on: June 30, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

The Texas Supreme Court recently denied review in a child custody case, leaving the underlying appellate decision fully intact without a written explanation, in In the Interest of E.A.G., No. 09-24-00174-CV (Tex. App.—Beaumont 2025). The order stresses an important facet of Texas family law: in most custody and parental-rights cases, the court of appeals is effectively the final stop in the litigation process.

The denial also reflects the limited circumstances in which the Texas Supreme Court exercises discretionary review over family law matters, even where the stakes involve termination of parental rights or long-term conservatorship determinations.

The Underlying Appeal