Kelly McClure, Author at Texas Divorce Attorney Blog

What the Amy Schumer Divorce Highlights About Planning for Texas Divorces

Published on: January 10, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

Amy Schumer and Chris Fischer have announced on social media that they are divorcing after seven years of marriage. Let’s evaluate the dissolution of this marriage from the perspective of a family law attorney.

Even prior to the marriage, Schumer was an internationally famous comedian. Fischer is successful in his own field as a James Beard Foundation Award-winning chef, though Schumer’s net worth dwarfs Fischer’s at the time of writing. These facts matter when weighing the division of assets and debts, though a more penetrating accounting would be necessary.

It’s unclear whether the couple signed any pre- or post-marital agreements, as they never publicly commented on this facet of their relationship. This question piques our interest because pre-marital agreements, post-marital agreements, and pre-divorce planning simply carry higher stakes in terminations involving high-income spouses with significant assets (and possibly debts) to gain or lose.

Sealing Your Case in High Net Worth Divorce

Published on: January 3, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

Texas family law proceedings are generally open to the public, but parties in high-net-worth divorces frequently seek to shield sensitive financial and personal information from disclosure. A recent dispute surrounding the divorce records of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Texas Senator Angela Paxton illustrates how courts approach requests to seal family law records when privacy concerns collide with public access.

The Dispute Over Sealed Divorce Records

At the start of their divorce proceedings, the Paxtons requested that their court records be sealed. Media organizations then sought to unseal records from their divorce proceedings on the basis of the public’s interest and governmental accountability.

Texas Supreme Court Clarifies When a Default Divorce Judgment Can Be Set Aside

Published on: January 1, 2026 | by Kelly McClure

The Supreme Court of Texas has weighed in on the thorny question of when a default divorce judgment should be undone. In a recent case, a husband filed for divorce and sought to serve his wife with divorce papers. At the time, the wife was residing at her parents’ house with their child. After attempts at personal service were unsuccessful, the trial court authorized service by alternative means.

Despite the alternative service, the wife remained unaware that she had been served and did not file an answer. The trial court entered a default divorce decree, dividing the parties’ property.

Motion for New Trial

Military Retirement and Disability in Texas Divorce Settlement

Published on: December 26, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

Parties to a Texas divorce may wish to reach a settlement agreement to avoid protracted litigation and resolve their issues amicably. Divorcing spouses may enter into an agreement incident to divorce pursuant to Tex. Fam. Code § 7.006, which may generally be revised or repudiated at any time before the divorce is rendered. They may also enter into a mediated settlement agreement pursuant to Tex. Fam. Code § 6.002. A mediated settlement agreement under § 6.002 is binding if it includes a prominent statement that it is not subject to revocation and is signed by both parties and their attorneys who are present. In a recent case, a former husband challenged a divorce decree that included language that was not in the parties’ mediated settlement agreement prohibiting him from waiving his military retirement for disability.

The parties executed a mediated settlement agreement (“MSA”) providing that the wife would get 50% of the community portion of her husband’s “net disposable retired pay.”

The wife asked the court to add a provision to the final divorce decree that would prohibit the husband from waiving military retirement pay in exchange for military disability. She asked the court to include language requiring him to reimburse her if he elected to waive retirement pay and receive disability.

Business Was Not Required to Be Served in Action to Enforce Texas Property Division

Published on: December 15, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

Pursuant to Chapter 9 of the Texas Family Code, a party may file suit to enforce the property division in a divorce decree. If a party’s “rights, duties, powers, or liabilities may be affected” by the enforcement action, they must receive notice by citation. Tex. Fam. Code § 9.001.

A former husband recently challenged court orders resulting from the ex-wife’s enforcement action. The former wife petitioned for enforcement and applied for a turnover order and appointment of a receiver. She alleged she had learned that certain property on Highway 105 owned by a limited liability company was to be sold and was concerned she would not get the share of the net proceeds that had been awarded to her. She asked the court to appoint a receiver to obtain possession of the ex-husband’s property to satisfy the $5,000 judgment for attorney’s fees and to hold the property pending orders of the court distributing the limited liability company ownership or the ex-husbands ownership of any other limited liability company. She also requested a turnover order and related attorney’s fees.

The ex-husband moved for a continuance the day of the hearing. His attorney argued he was served less than ten days before the hearing and the company had not been served. He argued he was not served with a citation for the business and judgment could not be entered without service on the company. He also argued the ex-wife had filed a lis pendens against the company and that the company needed to be served to make an appearance.

Texas Court Denies Relocation of Child to England

Published on: December 1, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

To modify a Texas custody order, the parent must show that the modification would be in the child’s best interest and that there has been a material and substantial change in circumstances. Tex. Fam. Code § 156.101(a). The Texas Supreme Court set forth factors to be considered in relocation cases in Lenz v. Lenz. In a recent case, a mother appealed a court’s decision not to remove a geographic restriction to allow her to move with the child to live with her new husband in England.

Under the divorce decree, the mother had the exclusive right to designate the child’s primary residence within El Paso County.

The mother started dating a goalkeeper coach for an English Premier League soccer team. She told the father she planned to move to England and he petitioned for modification to be named primary managing conservator with the exclusive right to designate the child’s primary residence. The mother filed a counter-petition seeking removal of the geographic restriction.

The mother testified she quit her job and her fiancé would support her and the child. She said she intended to move regardless of the court’s decision. She testified the child would have opportunities in Manchester, including private school, after-school programs, and exposure to other cultures. She acknowledged the child asked her father not to “sign off” on the papers for relocation because she did not want to move.

Texas Appeals Court Reverses Property Division in High Net Worth Divorce Involving Allegations of Fraud

Published on: November 22, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

High net worth divorces and business divorces can often be contentious. In some cases, spouses may allege fraud or other improper actions by the other spouse. There is a presumption of fraud when a spouse disposes of the other’s one-half interest in a community asset without their consent or knowledge. Cantu v. Cantu. The presumption shifts the burden to the spouse who disposed of the property to show that the transaction was fair. Key v. Key. In a recent case, a former wife appealed issues related to alleged fraud and the property division.

The parties operated a jewelry business during their marriage. The wife petitioned for divorce in January 2019. The parties agreed that the fraud and reconstitution of the community estate issues would go the jury and the property division would be tried by the bench. The jury found that both parties committed fraud on the community. The jury was asked to evaluate the fairness of certain transactions from the wife to her mother and found that the wife unfairly depleted the community estate by $1,269,720.35.

The court determined the reconstituted estate had over $4.5 million in assets and over $470,000 in debts. The court allocated 50.51% of the assets to the wife and 49.49% to the husband. More than half of the assets allocated to the wife was the value of her unfair transactions as determined by the jury. The assets allocated to the husband included properties valued at about $1.9 million and the jewelry business. The court also allocated 70.36% of the debts to the wife. The court also ordered the wife to pay the husband a $131,710 equalization payment. Ultimately, the husband received 55% of the reconstituted estate and the wife 45%.

Wife Granted Portion of Proceeds of Husband’s Separate Property House Purchased Prior to Marriage

Published on: November 9, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

In Texas, property acquired by either spouse during the marriage is presumed to be community property. However, property acquired prior to marriage is not community property. In a recent case, the parties disputed the ownership of a piece of property they bought before marriage.

Before the parties married, they bought a property in Floresville with both names listed as “Grantee” on the warranty deed.

The wife petitioned for divorce in August 2023. She testified that the property was purchased with money from their joint account. She said that proceeds from the sale of a property owned by the husband were in the joint account but said they had both contributed funds to the joint account.

Texas Reversal of Temporary Injunction Enjoining Ex-Wife From Filing Lawsuits Related to the Parties’ Company

Published on: October 29, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

The division of a business in a Texas divorce can result in ongoing disputes, even after the divorce is finalized. This can be especially true when one party has control of the business while both parties maintain an ownership interest. A former wife recently appealed a temporary injunction enjoining her from filing lawsuits against the Company and other parties.

The parties divorced in 2019. They owned a corporation and other related entities together, collectively referred to by the appeals court as the “Company.” The divorce decree ordered the sale of the Company, and appointed a separate entity to do the sale.

The ex-wife appealed the property division in the divorce decree, and the appeals court affirmed. She also appealed a take-nothing judgment against her in a lawsuit in which she alleged the ex-husband had engaged in fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. That appeal was still pending at the time of the appeals court’s decision in this matter.

Texas Appeals Court Affirms Characterization of Parental Gift as Separate Property

Published on: October 15, 2025 | by Kelly McClure

The court in a Texas divorce case must divide the estate in a “just and right” manner. Property acquired by either spouse during the marriage, except separate property, is community property. Tex. Fam. Code § 3.002. Separate property includes property acquired by a spouse by gift. Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001. There is a rebuttable gift presumption for property conveyed by a parent to a child. The presumption can be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that the parent lacked donative intent. A former husband recently challenged characterization of certain property the wife claimed had been gifted to her, as well as a provision stating the wife was entitled to file taxes as head of household, and a number of other issues.

The wife bought a new home in July 1999. She and her father were listed as the grantees on the deed, but the husband put $25,000 down. The parties got married that September and lived in the home. The wife’s father’s interest in the home was transferred to the husband in October 2000.

The husband worked as an engineer when they married but was laid off in 2007. At the time of the trial, he had not had full-time employment since that lay-off. He had received a severance and used it for bills and living expenses until it was depleted. The husband cared for the parties’ young child while the wife worked full time.