Articles Posted in separate property

Large inheritances, trusts, and gifts can complicate the property division in a Texas divorce. A spouse’s separate property includes the property they received during the marriage through gift, descent, or devise. Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001.  In a recent case, a former husband challenged his divorce decree that characterized mineral rights he obtained from his mother’s trust as community property.

According to the opinion, when the husband’s mother died, she left a trust for the benefit of the husband’s father during his lifetime.  The trust included mineral rights to certain property, which the husband’s father transferred to the husband and his siblings on November 1, 2009.  The deed stated the grantor transferred the mineral rights to the husband and his five siblings “[f]or an adequate consideration paid and received.”

The husband testified his father gifted each sibling $12,000 from their mother’s estate to purchase the mineral rights.  He presented a carbon copy check for $12,000 dated November 19, 2009, but it did not have an account number, payor name, or signature. A bank statement for the parties’ joint account reflected a $12,171 deposit on November 23 and a check for $11,130.50 on December 3.  Those records did not indicate the source of the funds or who deposited them.  They also did not show who wrote the check or who received it.

Continue Reading ›

Certain assets, especially stocks or assets related to a business, may be held in the name of just one spouse, even if they are community property. In a Texas divorce, a court may impose a constructive trust requiring the spouse to transfer property to the other spouse. Tex. Fam Code 9.011 provides that receipt by one spouse of certain installment or lump-sum payments that were awarded to the other spouse in a divorce decree gives rise to a fiduciary obligation and imposes a constructive trust on the property.

In a recent case, a former husband challenged the divorce decree that imposed a constructive trust on future payments to him as stockholder in a corporation, arguing that part of the payments should be considered his separate property.

The husband was an oncologist who was involved in the development of a drug to treat breast cancer. A corporation owned the patent rights for the drug and the husband acquired stocks equaling 30.33% ownership of the corporation with community funds.

Continue Reading ›

Characterization and valuation of property can be heavily contested issues in Texas divorces, especially in cases involving a high net worth or businesses.  A wife recently challenged the court’s characterization of certain property and property division.

The husband petitioned for divorce just a year and eight months after the marriage.  The court’s judgment confirmed certain property as his separate property and divided the community property. The court awarded specific items to each party, and granted a judgment for half the value to the other party, resulting in a generally equal division of the community property. The court also divided cash and bank accounts equally.

The court awarded the wife an equalization judgment of $232,878.85 and the husband an equalization judgment of $56,300. The court also awarded the husband a judgment of $80,000 for his separate property that the court found the wife had converted.

Continue Reading ›

All property possessed by either spouse at the time of a Texas divorce is presumed to be community property, but this presumption can be rebutted with clear and convincing evidence. Property’s characterization is determined by the inception of title. Separate property retains its separate character if the spouse can rebut the community presumption by tracing the assets back to separate property. If separate and community property are commingled to an extent that would defy resegregation and identification, it will be presumed to be community property.

A former wife recently appealed the award of funds from a particular account in the divorce decree.

According to the appeals court, the trial court had awarded 60% of the funds in the account to the husband as his separate property.  The court found the remainder of the funds were community property and awarded each party half of that amount as their separate property.

Continue Reading ›

The Supreme Court of Texas recently considered the property division in a Texas divorce case involving a complex estate, including an outstanding employee bonus, claims of separate property, and a retirement plan.

The parties got married in 2020 and were divorced in late 2019, with litigation regarding the property division continuing beyond the divorce.

Bonus

During the marriage, the husband worked for a large bank.  He received an annual cash and stock bonus contingent on the bank’s and his own performance.  The bonus was paid around February 15 each year.

Continue Reading ›

Texas spousal maintenance is only awarded under certain specific circumstances. The Texas Family Code sets out guidelines for the duration of a spousal support order, but the obligation to pay future maintenance also terminates on the death of either party, remarriage of the former spouse receiving maintenance, or upon a finding the former spouse receiving maintenance is cohabiting with a romantic partner. Tex. Fam. Code § 8.056.

In a recent case, a Texas appeals court considered whether a former husband’s obligation to pay property taxes should have been terminated with the monthly spousal maintenance when the former wife was cohabiting with a romantic partner.

Divorce Decree

The 2014 final divorce decree awarded the former husband as separate property “all rights, title, and interest” in a particular piece of real estate in San Antonio.  It also awarded the former wife a life estate in that property.  The husband was ordered to pay $1,500 in monthly spousal support, as well as the mortgage payments as “an additional spousal support obligation.”

Continue Reading ›

When individuals with a high net worth marry, they often bring significant separate assets to the marriage.  When marriages with complex estates end, there may be disputes over whether property is community property or the separate property of one of the spouses. The trial court in a divorce must divide the community estate of the parties in a just and right manner.  The trial court generally may not divest a spouse of their separate property by awarding it in whole or in part to the other spouse.   Community property is the property, other than separate property, acquired by either spouse during the marriage.  Tex. Fam. Code § 3.002. Separate property includes property the spouse owned before the marriage and property gifted, devised, or descended to the spouse during the marriage.  Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001.  Texas law has a rebuttable presumption that property possessed by either spouse at the time of the divorce is community property.  Tex. Fam. Code § 3.003.  The spouse claiming property is separate has the burden of proving the property’s character by clear and convincing evidence.  In a recent case, a husband appealed a property division he claimed improperly divested him of his separate property.

The Property

The parties got married in 2008.  The wife petitioned for divorce in 2021 and subsequently amended her complaint to allege adultery.  The primary issue at trial was the characterization of a particular piece of real property.

According to the appeals court’s opinion, the husband’s parents gave him a tract of land in 1995. The wife testified it was her understanding the husband’s parents had given the property to him as a gift in 1995. The husband testified that he had a house moved onto the land the same year.

Continue Reading ›

The court in a Texas divorce case must divide the parties’ estate in a just and right manner. Tex. Fam. Code § 7.001. Complex estates may include both community and separate property, acquired from various sources.  The court can only divide community property, which is any property acquired by a spouse during the marriage except separate property.  Separate property includes property owned by the spouse before the marriage and property acquired by a spouse during the marriage through gift, devise, or descent.  Tex. Fam. Code § 3.001(2).  There is a presumption property either spouse possesses during or on dissolution of the marriage is community property and a spouse claiming property is separate has the burden of proof to a clear and convincing standard. Tex. Fam. Code § 3.003.

In a recent case, a former wife appealed the court’s property division in the final divorce decree. The parties got married in 1999 and had one child. The husband petitioned for divorce in 2017. He asked the court to confirm two pieces of real property were his separate property.  The wife sought reimbursement to and reconstitution of the community estate and spousal maintenance.  The court filed the final divorce decree in January 2024 and the wife appealed.

Separate Property

On appeal, the wife challenged the trial court’s characterization of the “69th Street property” as the husband’s separate property.  She argued the husband had not presented sufficient evidence to support his testimony that he had inherited it.

Continue Reading ›

Under Texas family law, community property is the property acquired by either spouse during the marriage that is not separate property.  Separate property includes property a spouse owned or claimed before the marriage, property acquired by gift or inheritance during the marriage, and recovery for personal injuries, except recovery for lost earning capacity during the marriage.  In a recent case, a former wife challenged a property division characterizing certain property as the husband’s separate property.

According to the appeals court, the parties got married in 2018.  The husband inherited about $650,000 from his mother during the marriage. He bought a pickup truck and a home with those funds.  The title and the deed each listed both parties as owners.

The husband petitioned for divorce in January 2023, asking the court to confirm his separate property and order reimbursement for the home and the pickup truck.  The wife alleged both the truck and property were part of the community estate.

Continue Reading ›

Property’s characterization as either separate or community property in a Texas divorce is generally determined by its character at inception.  The Texas Family Code includes a presumption that property either spouse possesses during or on dissolution is community property.  Tex. Fam. Code § 3.003(a).  The Code defines “community property” as the property acquired during the marriage by either spouse, except separate property.  § 3.002.  Personal income and income produced by separate property is generally community property.  Spouses may, however, enter contracts changing their rights and obligations with regard to property. Although premarital agreements are contracts and generally interpretated according to the rules of contract interpretation, they are narrowly construed in favor of the community estate. A former husband recently appealed the property division in his divorce, argued the court had failed to apply the terms of the premarital agreement.

Premarital Agreement

The parties had signed a premarital agreement two days before their wedding.  The husband drafted the agreement based on a form from the internet.  The agreement was partially typed and partially handwritten.  The agreement included a Separate Property Provision that provided that the separate property each party brought to the marriage would stay their separate property.  It also included an Acquired Property Provision that provided, “All property acquired by each during the marriage shall be deemed [th]eir property.” The agreement also stated that the husband’s 401(k), along with “income profits, Deferred Retirement Option (D.R.O.P.) or any benefits of any kind accruing from it” would remain his separate property.  The agreement further provided that the wife’s “personal income or retirement will remain her separate property.”

The dispute was over the meaning of the Acquired Property Provision, specifically related to the marital home and a vehicle. The husband bought the house four years into the marriage with funds received from the sale of a house in Hurst, Texas, he had purchased with his separate property in 2006.  The parties had lived in the home in Hurst from 2006 until 2014. The wife said she paid for improvements to both.

Continue Reading ›

Contact Information